Search Results

Trump Gold Card On December 10, 2025, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officially released the forms and instructions for the Trump Gold Card program, a new and highly exclusive pathway to U.S. permanent residence created by Executive Order. This program offers a dramatically accelerated route to a green card for high-net-worth individuals and corporate sponsors—but it also comes with significant financial, legal, and strategic risks. For those considering this option, one thing is clear: this is not a process to navigate alone. What Makes the Gold Card Program So Attractive The Gold Card allows qualified applicants to pursue permanent residence under EB-1 or EB-2 National Interest Waiver classifications in a matter of weeks instead of months or years. Unlike traditional employment-based immigration pathways, the Gold Card prioritizes speed and discretion for individuals and companies capable of making substantial financial contributions to the United States. Applicants must register through trumpcard.gov , pay a non-refundable $15,000 USCIS filing fee per person, and submit Form I-140G online through myUSCIS. Once background checks are completed, applicants are instructed to make a required financial “gift”: $1 million per individual applicant $2 million for corporate-sponsored principal applicants, plus $1 million per derivative family member For families and corporate sponsors, the total financial commitment can reach several million dollars, making proper planning and legal precision absolutely essential. Why Professional Legal Representation Is Critical While the Gold Card promises speed, the program is new, untested, and legally complex. USCIS guidance remains incomplete, and the application raises serious questions that only experienced immigration counsel can properly address. Key concerns include: Unclear legal standards for EB-1 and EB-2 NIW eligibility under the Gold Card framework Ambiguous and potentially unlawful donation requirements for spouses and children Extensive financial disclosures, including source of funds, net worth, employment history, and spousal financial accounts No refund or escrow protections for multi-million-dollar donations if a case is denied Uncertainty over consular processing vs. adjustment of status High likelihood of regulatory changes or legal challenges that could affect pending cases These are not minor details. A single misstep can result in denial and irreversible financial loss. This Is Where Strategic Legal Counsel Makes the Difference At Legal in USA (Offices of Immigration Attorney Eduardo Soto), we bring more than 35 years of immigration law experience to high-value, high-risk cases like the Gold Card. Our role is not simply to file forms, but to: Evaluate whether the Gold Card is truly the right strategy for you or your company Structure applications to minimize risk and maximize compliance Analyze source-of-funds documentation and financial exposure Anticipate USCIS scrutiny and future regulatory shifts Provide clear, realistic guidance in a legally uncertain landscape When millions of dollars and permanent residency are at stake, experience, judgment, and foresight matter. An Exclusive Opportunity Requires an Experienced Legal Partner The Gold Card is being marketed as a fast track to U.S. permanent residence—but in reality, it is a complex legal instrument that demands careful planning and expert execution. This is not a program for trial and error. If you are considering the Gold Card for yourself, your family, or your business, we invite you to speak with our team before taking any step. 📞 Call us at +1 305 446 8686 Legal in USA – Offices of Immigration Attorney Eduardo SotoTrusted immigration counsel for over 35 years A decision of this magnitude deserves experienced legal guidance from the very beginning.

The DHS is trying to close asylum cases currently pending in immigration courts by referencing the new agreements with Ecuador and Uganda. MOTION TO PRETERMIT THE RESPONDENT’S PROTECTION APPLICATIONS The notifications sent by DHS are generally filed under the title "Amended Motion to Pretermit the Respondent's Protection Applications ." Through these motions, the government requests immigration judges to dismiss asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (CAT) protection applications without a full hearing. In practical terms, this means that the government seeks to close the case before the person has the opportunity to testify, explain their story, or demonstrate fear of persecution or serious harm. If the motion is granted, the judge could end the process without an individual evaluation of the merits of the case, something that for years was not common practice, particularly in cases of Cuban applicants. The legal basis: agreements to transfer applicants to third countries The DHS's main argument is based on the application of the Asylum Cooperative Agreements (ACA), agreements signed between the United States and third countries that allow the transfer of asylum seekers so that their protection claim can be examined outside of U.S. territory. In recently filed motions, the DHS has cited existing agreements with Ecuador and Uganda, arguing that individuals covered by these agreements are legally barred from seeking protection in the United States. This interpretation is being applied not only against Venezuelans and other nationalities, but also against Cubans, marking a significant shift in the treatment of this group, which historically did not face such procedural barriers in its asylum cases. The legal consequences and the need to act immediately If a judge grants a motion to pretermit , the immediate consequence is that the person no longer has an active asylum case in court. This can lead to expedited removal, immigration detention, or even transfer to a third country, even if the applicant has no family, cultural, or legal ties to that place. For individuals who have complied with all their court appearances and were expecting a decision based on their testimony, this situation represents a serious and unexpected risk. Determining whether an individual is properly bound by an ACA, whether the agreement was applied lawfully, and whether due process guarantees were respected requires careful legal analysis and a strategic response within strict timeframes. Our office continues to actively review these cases and represent individuals whose asylum processes are being challenged through Motions to Pretermit . In today's immigration landscape, a timely and well-reasoned legal response can mean the difference between losing a case without a hearing and preserving the right to a fair evaluation before an immigration judge. If you need legal advice, you can contact us at +1 305 446 8686.

Immigration judges are now authorized to dismiss legally insufficient asylum applications without a hearing to help reduce the court backlog. On April 11, 2025, the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) released new guidance that could have a major impact on how asylum applications are processed in the United States. The new Policy Memorandum clarifies that immigration judges now have the authority to deny (pretermit) asylum applications without holding a hearing  when the application is clearly legally insufficient . Why This Change? With almost 4 million cases pending in immigration courts, the system is overwhelmed. Many cases take years to resolve. To help manage the massive backlog, EOIR is encouraging immigration judges to act quickly on cases that have no legal path to relief .This doesn’t mean judges can deny cases without reason — it only applies to cases where the facts are not in dispute, but the application itself doesn’t meet basic legal requirements. What Is a “Legally Insufficient” Asylum Application? An asylum application might be considered legally insufficient if: It was filed too late without a valid excuse. It doesn’t show a connection (nexus) to a protected ground like race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. The applicant has a disqualifying criminal conviction. Other clear legal bars apply. In these situations, immigration judges can dismiss the case without going through the full hearing process. Ensure that your asylum case is thoroughly prepared, as you have only one opportunity to present your defense. Are Hearings Still Required? Not always.Current immigration regulations say that a hearing is only needed if there are factual disputes . If the facts are accepted as true but the application still fails legally, no hearing is necessary .This helps courts avoid wasting time on applications that have no chance of success under the law. Does This Affect Everyone Applying for Asylum? No.Each case will still be reviewed individually, and judges have the discretion  to decide whether to pretermit an application or move forward with a hearing.Importantly, this policy does not  create new rights or enforceable benefits for applicants — it simply clarifies how judges can manage their courtrooms more efficiently. Why Is This Important? It helps immigration courts focus their time and resources on cases that genuinely need full hearings. It could lead to faster decisions  for many cases — both approvals and denials. It ensures that clearly ineligible applications don’t add to the already severe backlog. This change is part of a broader effort to make immigration courts more efficient. While it may speed up certain denials, it doesn’t change the fundamental rights of applicants to apply for asylum if they have valid claims.If you or someone you know is applying for asylum, it’s more important than ever to make sure your application is complete, legally strong, and backed by evidence . If you have questions about how this new policy could affect your case, it’s recommended to consult with an experienced immigration attorney .

In recent weeks, international students in the United States have faced a situation of great uncertainty due to the mass revocation of visas. However, after intense legal and social pressure, the government has decided to partially reverse this measure. What Happened with the Revocation of Student Visas? Beginning in March 2025, the Trump administration initiated the cancellation of more than 300 F-1 visas issued to international students, impacting prestigious institutions such as Harvard, Columbia, Stanford, and several universities across Texas, California, and the southern United States. Official justifications cited alleged "anti-national" activities, participation in pro-Palestinian protests, and minor legal infractions, including traffic violations and dismissed charges. Additionally, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) removed over 4,700 students from the SEVIS tracking system, leaving many without legal status and at imminent risk of deportation. Would you also like a second option that's even a bit sharper, depending on the style you're aiming for (more like a breaking news article or a feature analysis)? How Did the Academic and Legal Communities Respond? The measure sparked a wave of lawsuits across at least 23 states, with more than 130 students arguing that they had been denied due process and that the visa cancellations were arbitrary. Federal judges issued orders temporarily restoring the records of students in dozens of cases. Affected universities provided legal support and called for greater transparency and stronger due process protections for their international student populations. Los constantes cambios en las políticas de inmigración mantienen a muchos en incertidumbre, un abogado de inmigración te guía en tu proceso. What Was the Government's Final Decision? On April 25, 2025, the Department of Justice announced that ICE would restore the legal immigration status of thousands of international students whose visa records had been canceled based on alleged minor or non-existent infractions. However, this reversal does not apply to students whose visas were revoked by the State Department due to activities deemed threats to national security. How Does This Affect International Students? Although many students will regain their legal status, the situation has created a climate of uncertainty and fear. Some students have already left the country, while others have stopped attending classes for fear of being detained. Additionally, the Trump administration is developing new policies to establish future criteria for terminating immigration status records, which could result in further changes down the line. Is It Possible to Adjust from a Student Visa to Permanent Status? Yes, U.S. immigration law allows certain holders of F-1 student visas to adjust their status to permanent residency (green card) under specific conditions. These pathways may include securing a job offer and applying for an H-1B work visa, marrying a U.S. citizen, or participating in the Diversity Visa Lottery, among others. It is important to note that the adjustment of status process is complex and highly dependent on individual circumstances, including compliance with legal requirements and the absence of immigration violations. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to seek the guidance of an experienced immigration attorney to evaluate available options. Note: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific guidance regarding your immigration situation, please contact Legal en USA by clicking here.

States and organizations file lawsuits against Trump's executive orders ending birthright citizenship and authorizing expedited deportations. In the early days of Donald Trump's second term, executive orders issued from the Oval Office have sparked strong reactions from states and human rights organizations. Two of these orders, the elimination of birthright citizenship and the authorization of expedited deportations, have led to legal challenges questioning their constitutionality and compliance with current laws. These legal actions underscore the controversial impact of the new immigration policies. Legal Challenge to the Elimination of Birthright Citizenship Trump's executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship for children of undocumented parents has faced significant legal opposition. Twenty-two states have filed a lawsuit arguing that this measure contradicts the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Ratified in 1868, the 14th Amendment establishes that all persons born on U.S. soil are citizens, regardless of their parents' immigration status. The suing states contend that this executive order exceeds presidential authority by attempting to reinterpret a constitutional provision without following the established amendment process. "Birthright citizenship is a cornerstone of our democracy and a fundamental right that cannot be eliminated by presidential decree," stated the California Attorney General, one of the states leading the lawsuit. This case is expected to reach the Supreme Court, where a critical showdown over the scope of executive powers looms. No pierdas la oprtunidad de asegurar tu estatus en Estados Unidos. Legal en USA está aquí para guiarte. Lawsuit Against Expedited Deportations Immigrant rights organizations have also taken swift action against another executive order authorizing expedited deportations. This measure permits the immediate removal of undocumented immigrants without access to due judicial process, including asylum hearings. The lawsuit, filed by a coalition of pro-immigrant organizations, argues that this policy violates immigration laws and fundamental due process principles established by the Constitution. “We cannot allow the opportunity to be heard to be eliminated, especially for those fleeing violence and persecution,” stated a spokesperson for one of the plaintiff organizations. The impact of this measure is significant, as it could affect thousands of immigrants currently in the United States seeking protection. Critics argue that the order undermines fundamental human rights and endangers the lives of those in need of safety. These lawsuits highlight the tense legal landscape unfolding during Trump's presidency, with immigration policies set to become the focal point of intense judicial debates. Both cases have the potential to set significant precedents regarding the limits of executive power in immigration matters. Recommendations for Those Affected In this context, it is crucial for individuals impacted by these policies to seek immediate legal counsel. If you have questions about how these executive orders might affect your immigration case, the attorneys at Legal en USA are here to help. Call us at 305-446-8686 or click here  to schedule a consultation with our team of immigration experts.

On Tuesday, January 21, 2025, the "Remain in Mexico" program (MPP) was reinstated, significantly toughening the asylum application process in the United States and requiring applicants to wait in Mexican territory while their cases are resolved. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has reinstated the "Remain in Mexico" program, or MPP, a controversial immigration policy requiring asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases are processed in U.S. immigration courts. This policy, reintroduced by the new administration of Donald Trump, has sparked both support and criticism due to its significant impact on migrants' lives and border management. What Is the "Remain in Mexico" Program? Officially known as the "Migrant Protection Protocols" (MPP), this program was first implemented during Trump’s initial term and later suspended under the Biden administration. Its aim is to reduce the entry of migrants into the U.S. and manage asylum cases more efficiently. However, it forces asylum seekers to remain in Mexico, where many face dangerous conditions such as violence, extortion, and limited access to basic resources. The reinstatement of this policy has several implications: Delays in asylum processing:  Migrants must endure extended waits in Mexico, often under harsh conditions. Increased vulnerability:  Those waiting in Mexico are frequently targeted by criminal activities, including extortion and kidnapping. Limited legal resources:  Many migrants struggle to consult with attorneys while remaining on the other side of the border, which weakens their ability to present a strong case. Immigration attorneys at Legal en USA represent you in the preparation and defense of your asylum case, no matter where you are. MPP Was Previously Declared Illegal The "Remain in Mexico" program has faced considerable legal challenges. In August 2021, a federal court declared it illegal during the Biden administration, stating that it violated U.S. asylum laws by exposing migrants to unsafe conditions in Mexico without ensuring their security or access to proper legal procedures. Despite this ruling, the program was temporarily reinstated in December 2021 following a Supreme Court order that required the Biden administration to reimplement it while litigation was ongoing. In June 2022, the Biden administration officially terminated the program after an internal review concluded that it failed to meet humanitarian and legal standards. However, Donald Trump’s administration has now reinstated MPP as one of its initial executive actions, raising alarm among human rights advocates and migrant communities. Advice for Migrants Affected by MPP If you are impacted by this policy, it is crucial to take proactive steps to prepare your asylum case and ensure the best possible defense. Here are some key recommendations: Consult with an immigration attorney: A legal expert can help you build a strong case and ensure that you meet all necessary requirements. Professional guidance is critical to overcoming the obstacles posed by this program. Gather all necessary evidence: While waiting in Mexico, collect documents, photographs, medical reports, testimonies, and any other evidence that supports your asylum claim. Stay informed about your case: Monitor updates on your case through the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) platform. Staying updated can make a crucial difference. Seek local support networks: In Mexico, local organizations may provide resources such as legal assistance, shelter, and food. Research what services are available in your area. Prepare a strong defense: Present a clear, well-documented case that explains the specific reasons why you cannot return to your home country. At Legal en USA , we are committed to helping you navigate these complex immigration policies. Our team of experts is ready to guide you and prepare your asylum case while you wait in Mexico. Don’t let this policy discourage you. Call us at 305-446-8686  or click here  to schedule a consultation. We’re here to support you every step of the way.

President-elect Donald Trump signs executive orders tightening U.S. immigration policies in the early hours of his new term. In his initial actions as president during his second term, Donald Trump signed a series of executive orders from the Oval Office, signaling a stricter approach to immigration policies and border security. Announced on his Inauguration Day, these measures emphasize their impact on both legal and irregular migration, as well as national sovereignty and security. National Emergency Declaration at the Border Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border with Mexico. This order allows resources from the Department of Defense and the National Guard to be mobilized to complete the border wall and enhance territorial security. Clarification of the Military’s Role at the Border The order aims to "clarify" the role of the military in protecting the territorial integrity of the United States, stating that it is the country’s policy to ensure that the Armed Forces prioritize sovereignty protection along national borders. It also directs the Secretary of Defense to submit a plan for deploying U.S. Northern Command forces to the border. Border Security Authorities announced the termination of the policy known as "catch and release," which allowed individuals without legal status to be released while awaiting immigration court hearings. The "Remain in Mexico" policy was also reinstated, requiring some asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases are processed. Additionally, construction of the border wall is set to continue. Don´t let these measures be a concern. Immigration attorneys at Legal en USA take care of your case. End of Birthright Citizenship Trump signed an order to eliminate automatic birthright citizenship for children born to undocumented parents, a drastic reinterpretation of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. This controversial measure faces immediate legal challenges. Suspension of the Refugee Program The U.S. Refugee Admissions Program was temporarily suspended, further restricting access for individuals seeking protection in the United States. Designation of Cartels as Terrorists Transnational criminal groups such as the Tren de Aragua and MS-13 were designated as terrorist organizations. This designation aims to facilitate the detention and deportation of their members and strengthen inter-agency collaboration to combat these threats. Suspension of CBP One The CBP One app, which allowed migrants to schedule appointments at border entry points, was deactivated. This has left thousands in uncertainty, as previously scheduled appointments were canceled. Restoration of the Death Penalty Trump directed the Attorney General to seek the death penalty for cases of murder committed by undocumented immigrants, reinforcing his firm stance against crime. These measures represent a significant tightening of immigration and security policies under Trump’s administration, marking a sharp departure from the previous administration. These measures reflect a significant tightening of immigration policies by the new administration, with a direct focus on strengthening border security and limiting access to immigration benefits. While these changes create uncertainty and concern, it is important to remember that every case is unique, and legal alternatives may be available for those who do not yet have permanent status or protection against deportation. In this context, consulting with an immigration specialist is essential to explore options, develop strategies, and ensure the correct steps are taken in your immigration process. At Legal en USA, we are here to provide guidance and support at every stage of your case. Call us at 305-446-8686  to schedule a consultation with our team of experts.

Mexico implements a safe mobility pathway for migrants with CBP One appointments, facilitating their transfer from the southern border to the U.S. to apply for asylum. In an effort to improve the management and safety of migrants seeking asylum in the United States, the Mexican government has announced the creation of an "Emergency Safe Mobility Corridor." This initiative aims to transport migrants from Mexico's southern border who have a scheduled appointment through the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's CBP One application. What Does the Safe Mobility Pathway Involve? The route, announced by the Ministry of the Interior (Segob) and the National Institute of Migration (INM), is designed to facilitate the safe and orderly transport of migrants in the states of Chiapas and Tabasco, on Mexico's southern border. These migrants will receive ground transportation to the U.S. border, accompanied by federal, state, and municipal security institutions to ensure their protection during the journey. Migrants can schedule their appointment with CBP One from southern Mexico. Since the implementation of this measure, it has been reported that around 300 migrants who scheduled their appointment through the 'CBP One' application in Tabasco and Chiapas received a response to their request in just a few days. This process not only speeds up the appointment management but also ensures that migrants safely reach their entry point to the United States. The Mexican government has indicated that the departure points will be the Villahermosa Migratory Station in Tabasco and the South Zone Migration Regulation office in Tapachula, Chiapas. During the journey, migrants will receive food, and they will be provided with a Multiple Migration Form (FMM), granting them regular status for 20 days, allowing them to remain in Mexico legally during that time. At Legal en USA, we are here to help you. Our team of immigration attorneys has the experience and knowledge necessary to guide you through every step of the process. From preparing your case to legal representation, we are committed to ensuring that you receive the best possible advice. Keep Safety at the Forefront The new safe mobility pathway not only aims to facilitate the transportation of migrants but also to protect their safety during the journey. With the U.S. presidential elections around the corner, this policy responds to growing pressure to manage the migration flow more efficiently and reduce congestion at the border. While this measure is an important step toward a more orderly process, it does not eliminate the need to be well-prepared for what follows once you arrive in the United States. Having an immigration lawyer by your side will help you address any challenges that arise and ensure that your rights are protected. Do you need help with your immigration case? Don't wait until it's too late to seek help. If you're in the process of applying for asylum in the United States, or if you have questions about how to proceed once you arrive, Legal en USA is here to support you. Contact us today for a consultation to ensure you're making the best decisions for your future. This new pathway is a significant opportunity for many migrants, but like any immigration process, it's crucial to be well-informed and prepared. Our team at Legal en USA is ready to assist you every step of the way, from your arrival to the resolution of your case.

Adjustment of Status is the procedure that allows individuals already in the United States to apply for legal permanent residency, also known as a Green Card. Through this process, applicants can become permanent residents without having to leave the United States to complete the visa process in their home country. Tabla de Contenido What is Adjustment of Status? What are the pathways for adjusting status? Family Based Petition Employment Based Petitions Refugees and Asylees Diversity Visas Special Visa Holders Cuban Adjustment Act Contact an immigration attorney. Adjustment of Status is the process through which a foreign national who is legally present in the United States, such as on a non-immigrant visa, TPS, or as a beneficiary of an approved family petition, applies to change their immigration status to legal permanent resident (Green Card holder) without having to leave the country. This process involves filing Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), along with the required documentation and payment of the applicable fees. If the application is approved, the applicant receives a Green Card and becomes a legal permanent resident of the United States. It is important to meet all requirements and procedures correctly and follow the instructions provided by USCIS during the adjustment of status process. What are the pathways for adjusting status? There are different pathways to adjust status in the United States, which may vary depending on each individual case. Here, we explain some of the options for adjusting status. Through Family Petition Immediate relatives of U.S. citizens or permanent residents, such as spouses, unmarried children under 21, and parents (if the citizen is at least 21 years old), can be petitioned by their family member to obtain permanent residency. Through Employment There are various employment-based visas, including categories such as individuals with extraordinary skills, professionals with advanced degrees, religious workers, and certain investors. Refugees and Asylees Refugees and asylees can apply for adjustment of status one year after their admission or grant of asylum in the United States. Diversity Immigrants (Visa Lottery) Winners of the Diversity Visa Lottery who are in the United States can adjust their status. Special Visa Holders This includes holders of K visas (fiancés and spouses of U.S. citizens) and V visas (certain relatives of permanent residents). Cuban Adjustment Act Cuban nationals who have been present in the United States for at least one year may be eligible to adjust their status. Each of these pathways has specific requirements and detailed processes that must be followed carefully to ensure a successful transition to legal permanent residency. It is advisable to consult with an immigration attorney to determine the best adjustment of status route based on your personal situation and current immigration status

USCIS has started accepting online applications for Parole in Place through Form I-131F. August 19, 2024, marks an important date for many families in the United States. USCIS has begun accepting applications for Parole in Place, a crucial benefit aimed at spouses and children of U.S. citizens who wish to regularize their immigration status without having to leave the country. What is Parole in Place? Parole in Place is an immigration tool that allows certain immediate family members of U.S. military members, as well as other U.S. citizens, to obtain special permission to legally remain in the country. Although temporary, this permission provides a significant solution for those who might otherwise face deportation or family separation. Application Process for Parole in Place: Key Points Here’s a breakdown of the most important aspects you need to know about the application process: 1. Online Application Submission: Starting August 19, 2024, Form I-131F , required to apply for Parole in Place, can only be completed and submitted online through the USCIS website. It's crucial to note that applications sent by postal mail will not be accepted. 2. Filing Fee: The cost to submit Form I-131F is $580 . USCIS has clarified that no fee waivers or reductions will be offered for this application, so it's important to be prepared to cover this cost when submitting your application. 3. One Application Per Person: Each applicant, regardless of age, must submit a separate Form I-131F . This means that if you are a U.S. citizen applying for parole in place for your spouse and children, you will need to complete an individual application for each of them. Additionally, each applicant must have their own USCIS online account. 4. Required Documentation: As you complete the online form, the USCIS system will automatically indicate which additional documents you need to provide to support your application. This process helps ensure that you don't miss any essential documents. 5. Biometric Appointment: After submitting the application, beneficiaries will need to attend a biometric appointment at a USCIS-designated center. During this appointment, fingerprints and other biometric information will be collected for security and verification purposes. 6. Approval and Parole Documentation: If your application is approved, the non-citizen spouse or stepchild will receive a Form I-94 , which will serve as proof of their permission to remain in the country (parole). 7. Important Travel Warning: It’s crucial to understand that Form I-94 does not authorize reentry into the United States after leaving the country. If someone who has received parole in place leaves the U.S. without first obtaining an Advance Parole document, they will automatically lose their parole status and may not be able to return to the country. Parole in Place offers a valuable opportunity for the spouses and children of U.S. citizens who need to regularize their immigration status without leaving the United States. However, it's crucial to carefully follow each step of the application process to ensure a successful submission. If you have questions or need assistance with your application, we recommend contacting an immigration attorney who can guide you through this process.